Here’s what happened

Inspired by Howard, Colleen, Andy and Kari, I thought I would give you some insight into my medical story.  The story started almost 4 years ago when I was diagnosed with endometriosis and hopefully, after yesterday, has come to its final chapter.  In talking with my close friends, many also suffer with the disease.  After much prodding and procedures it was determined I had an especially delicate case since it was suspected that the disease had entered my colon.  As you can imagine, this caused quite distressing pain.  I had great fear of going into surgery  – as the risks were quite overwhelming.  So, as an initial treatment plan I was advised to try hormone suppression therapy (i.e. forced menopause).  I tried that for about a year and while it stopped the worse symptoms of the disease, it caused a plethora of unpleasant and unbearable side effects.

I quit the medication for almost a year and 1/2 and then, towards the end of last year, things boiled back up to being unbearable again.  In December, I made the decision to take care of myself and go the surgical route.  I was referred to Dr. Tommaso Falcone at the Cleveland Clinic. From our inital meeting, to the surgery yesterday, I never had a single doubt or fear. Dr. Falcone is an amazing professional and the staff at the Cleveland Clinic, from the front desk, to pre-op, to the recovery room was and is world class.

During the surgery yesterday – Dr. Falcone removed the endometriosis from my ovaries, bladder, and bowel.  He removed my appendix which was completely covered by the endometriosis and another specialist was called into the surgery to assist with my colon, which had been bound and twisted by the enodmetriosis.  No wonder I was in so much pain! Though I am rough around the edges after the surgery, I’m confident that I made the right decision and that my insides have finally been set straight!

I can’t thank all of you enough for the outpouring of support – I often proclaim my love for my social network and all of the messages/tweets/posts sure do make me feel loved.  There is one very special person who deserves public thanks (over and over) – my husband Scott.  While I focused hiding my pain at work and school, I did not hide it at home.  I thank and love him for sticking with me, especially during the low points over the past few years.  I look forward to getting back on track and being healthy and happy!

I’m staying low-key for the next couple of days (hard for me to do!) – I look forward to getting back at it very soon! xoxo

Google Docs as a Developer Notebook

In an assignment inspired by O’Reilly’s “Developer Notebook” series, I have students create a document in Google Docs and share with the instructor and teaching assistants. The course is titled CEP 820: Teaching K12 Students Online and the final product of this particular assignment is a “Notebook” companion to an online course module they develop over the semester. This notebook is meant to be shared with peers in their particular grade level and subject areas. Since this is an “in process” writing assignment, we chose to use Google Docs over a blog because it allows for frequent revisions, feedback and iterations before polishing and publishing to a wider audience. Google docs has proven to be a great tool for facilitating the feedback and writing process with our online students.

The crux of the O’Reilly developer notebook series is the following:

  • Example-driven
  • Aimed at developers
  • Actually Enjoyable

This is an excellent framework to co-opt for the developer notebook assignment. The products the students create will be usable (and enjoyable) to a wide audience and fill a niche that does not currently exist at that level of specificity.  There are many “how-to” create online courses or use course management software books — but very few specific resources for teachers to reference when developing for their own grade level/subject area and CMS of choice. The ultimate goal of the notebook is to have something the students can publish and share with colleagues who are going through a similar development process.  We have a wide spectrum of subject areas/grade levels and CMS choices in CEP 820.  For example, a 3rd grade teacher may be producing a notebook on how he created his unit in Moodle; an earth science teacher may be developing her course using Ning and so on.


GREAT, HOW DO I DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS IN MY COURSE?

Each online unit (or what I call “Chapter”) in CEP 820 consists of a Road Map, Lecture, Lab and Assignment. In the first chapter – we set the stage for the developer notebook by having students complete the following “lab”

Google Docs is an incredible collaboration and productivity tool.

This is the “anchor” tool in CEP 820.  In each of our courses, we try to choose 1 technology to focus on — in this course, the majority of our written work will be facilitated through Google Docs.  Of course we will experiment with lots of other technologies along the way, but we expect you to become highly proficient in the use of Google Docs for collaboration.  Now, there are many alternatives to Google Docs that you should be aware of Zoho, Office Live, Buzzword, & Peepel (to name a few.)  We have experimented with all of these tools and have chosen Google Docs because of its ease of access, usability and reliable infrastructure/backbone.  (What is the site most people go to when troubleshooting web connections — Google.  If Google is down, you know there is a problem!) Additionally, Google has made a concerted effort to connect with the educational community and has created a wealth of resources for the K-12 and higher-education worlds. This is not to say that the other tools do not have competitive advantages over one another, but we don’t want the technology to get in the way here.  This course is about learning how to teaching online, not learning how to use every online productivity tool.

For those new to Google Docs, here is a brief introduction from the popular Common Craft “In Plain English” series:

(If the video above appears corrupted on YouTube, click this link to view the video: http://dotsub.com/view/59ff663a-26e6-4b7b-9b2a-82637fed3652)

MSU Google Apps for Education:

This fall, MSU partnered with Google to offer Google apps through MSU’s secure network. What this does is allow students and faculty to share documents with fellow students and faculty more securely on MSU servers. Thus, you do not have to create an additional username and ID to access google docs! (If you do have an @gmail account, we ask that you use your @msu/Google Apps account for this course.)

To access MSU google apps – go to http://googleapps.msu.edu

Optional help with MSU Google apps:

Specific help files have been created by MSU to help you with Google Apps here: http://techbase.msu.edu/article.asp?id=13275

If you already have a prior Google account, you may want to look at this msu help article for exporting documents and calendars: http://techbase.msu.edu/article.asp?id=13177&service=techbase

Finally, if you have any Google Sites (Google’s version of a web site editor), you may want to look at this tech article: http://techbase.msu.edu/article.asp?id=13256&service=techbase


There are 2 steps to this lab: Learning and DoingStep 1: The Learning Part

There are several tutorials available if you are unfamiliar with the ins and outs of Google Docs. We have a wide range of experience in this class, from novice to expert.  One advantage to learning and teaching online is that we have an extraordinary amount of leverage in delivering technical support to you.   There is a basic level of understanding that you need to complete the assignments.  As a college, we have a subscription to Atomic Learning.  This is an EXCELLENT resource for step-by-step tutorials to give a basic understanding of the capability of software.

For this lab (and the course) we expect that you understand all of the information contained in the following tutorials:

Google Documents: http://movies.atomiclearning.com/k12/google_docs
Google Spreadsheets: http://movies.atomiclearning.com/k12/google_spreadsheets

Now, if you already know Google Docs very well, you can go above and beyond the requirements by exploring these advanced tutorials on the Google Docs Community channel on YouTube.   If you’re still getting your feet wet, you can bookmark the channel and save it for later!

Step 2: The Doing Part

We are going to use a Google Spreadsheet to help track your progress this semester.  Actually, it’s beneficial for you AND for instructors.  It gives you a clear idea of due dates for the “big” assignments in the course and helps us, at a glance, see how you are progressing.  One of the first questions I always get when showing the assignment tracker is “what if someone goes in and deletes all of the data?” As you learned in the tutorials, there is a handy “view revision history” feature that lets us see who has made changes to the document (we also have set notifications for the edits!) No grades are every displayed on the spreadsheet, it’s just a nice, clear way of seeing assignments and due dates throughout the semester.

In the brief video below, we give you an introduction to the Assignment Tracker.

We’ll give more information on the assignment tracker in Chapter 2 — for now…let’s get going on your tasks.

Task 1: Welcome to “The Assignment Tracker”
On Monday, January 18th, you received an invitation to “CEP 820 Assignment Tracker – Fall”

1. Accept the invitation
2. Enter your name in the spreadsheet under your assigned dorm using the following format:

Lastname, Firstname

You’ll know your dorm name by looking at the name of your dorm under “Lessons” in ANGEL.

Task 2: Share a Document
Create a Google document called yourlastname_notebook (of course, replace yourlastname with your last name i.e. wolf_notebook)

Share the document with:

<instructor/ta emails> – give us rights to edit.

That’s it! We’ll be doing much more during the next unit and you’ll be adding to the yourlastname_notebook document in your assignment for this chapter! (Which, as you can see on the spreadsheet, is due on February 1st.)


To summarizeFor this lab, you should have:

— completed all of the Atomic Learning Tutorials for Google Documents and Google Spreadsheets
— accepted the invitation to the “CEP 820 Spring 2010 Assignment Tracker” spreadsheet and added your name under your assigned dorm
— share a document called yourlastname_notebook with instructors using Google Documents

Once you have completed these Lab tasks, make sure to mark “done” in the “Intro Survey” Column on the Assignment Tracker


Ready for the next challenge? Let’s move on to the assignment

Next, the assignment

As you learned in the lab, the development of the notebook will be achieved using a shared Google Document. This will allow us to track your progress over the semester and provide feedback to you in one tidy learning space. During this course we asked you to leave your reservations on the virtual doorstep and for many, the following request may cause a bit of anxiety as the process of “formal writing” tends to conjure up tummy aches and grumbles.  We are intentionally leaving a rubric out of this stage in the writing process for several reasons. First and foremost, we are in the first chapter of the course and you have not been exposed to enough theory and practice to write a paper on the potential pitfalls and praxis of online learning. There is no “right or wrong” in this notebook — the key is learning how to communicate. With that said, in the entry one stage, we need you to do some initial brainstorming for the development of your course — believe us, things will change as the semester moves along — it’s all part of the process!
•    Grade Level:
•    Subject:
•    Particular Curricular Unit you are thinking of developing:
•    What do you want your course to look like?
•    What your ideas/thoughts/dreams for class interaction for both teacher and students?
•    How do you think you will assess students?
•    What are some of the social, ethical, legal, and human issues surrounding the participation in your online course?

If you wish, a good way to start, may be to copy and paste the questions above and write a few paragraphs under each one. Citations are not necessary. There is no proper order, let your questions, concerns & ideas flow! We will be providing detailed suggestions on the ideas you present. Our goal here is to help you become better communicators and to think through all the things that are involved in online course development. When we provide feedback & constructive criticism to you, we ask that you do not fear that you are “failing.” We want you to get the most you can out of this course!

BACK END TIPS

In Google Docs Create a folder to organize all the docs into an easily accessible area

As you saw in the lab above, we use Robin Dickson’s Google Spreadsheet “Assignment Tracker”to articulate expectations and check-in points. Setting specific check-in/due dates helps the iterative process of the writing and feedback reinforcing that this is a real-time, live, engaged writing process with and between student and instructor.

LESSONS LEARNED

In Fall 2009 this assignment was called a “Justification Paper” — the word “paper” put an extra layer of anxiety and expectation on to the students so this semester,  I changed the assignment to a “notebook.”  This twist more accurately represented the iterative nature of the assignment and I am hoping it will help to clarify the expectations and put more emphasis on the writing and revision process.

Last semester, for the final “paper” entry, I required the students to delete the progress they had made and summarize their thoughts into a short essay.  I found it interesting that many students wanted to share a new document instead of making changes in the existing notebook.  I tried to articulate that your work is never really “lost” with Google Docs due to the history and revision changes.  This semester, we will integrate the history and revision changes more tightly into the writing process so students can see the power (and purpose) of the history revision feature.

From a time management perspective – it is fairly time intensive (we had 40 students last semester) – however,  for me the investment paid off. From an organizational stand point was so much better than passing around .doc files, checking blog postings, or editing on a wiki.  The “workflow” clicked perfectly and I look forward to editing and revising the assignment to make it even more meaningful and useful to students. From a pedagogical standpoint, students sincerely appreciated the frequent and detailed feedback throughout the writing process (as opposed to “final” feedback with no opportunity for revision.) Additionally, when the notebooks are finished they can easily be published, pdf’d or exported to Word for touching up and printing.

A BIG thanks to Laeeq Khan, Greg Casperson, and Anne Heintz who have helped with the development and teaching of CEP 820 during the fall and spring and to Dr. Robin Dickson for her innovative use of the Google Spreadsheet Assignment Tracker.

MAET students – help is (virtually) here!

I would like to introduce you to a new pilot program for our students in the MAET program. As our online offerings continue to grow, so do our expectations of our students. As you know, multi-media artifacts (from podcasts, to video, to websites) are a regular and integral part of MAET coursework.  Even though the tools have improved over the years, inevitably, we all get stuck with a tech problem from time to time.

To address this issue, we are pleased to announce that Theresa Hamilton & Amy Gracik, two of our  Technology Interns in Education at the college, have graciously agreed to help serve as a virtual help desk for MAET students. (Thanks also to Terri Gustafson and Punya Mishra who helped make this initiative possible.) Essentially Theresa and Amy will be available as an asynchronous form of online tech support for students. They will not assist with hardware or network issues, they are here as another layer of instructor support to help students who are stuck with assignments that utilize software on the required software list (http://tinyurl.com/maetsofware) or other web-based software projects (edublogs, voicethread, moodle, etc.)

To request help – simply go to:
http://groups.google.com/group/maetsupport
Sign in with a google account and start a new discussion topic!

Posts requesting help should be formatted as follows:

Course Number:
Assignment Title: (if applicable)
Tech Question:
It is very helpful if students create a brief screencast or screenshots demonstrating the tech problem they are having (using Jing http://www.jingproject.com) and post the link (via a free screencast.com account.)

As always, we welcome any other suggestions and feedback from students – we are here to support you as you stretch, grow and push boundaries!

Calling ALL MAET Friends and Alumni!

Zazzle Tastic!

I’m excited to announce that we have now opened up our “Alumni Refresher” to anyone who is interested in sharpening the tools in your ed tech toolboxes!

CEP 891 – Special Topics – MAET Refresher Course

3 graduate credits
July 11-18, 2010 – Rouen, France

In 2008, Jim Groom coined the term Edupunk, since then, the term has spread and come to symbolize educators who take an approach to teaching and learning practices that result from a DIY or bricolage (the construction or creation of a work from a diverse range of things which happen to be available) attitude.

The 2010 MAET refresher course will embrace the Edupunk mantra and help refill your technology toolbox with a plethora of tips and tricks to help you continue your post-MA educational technology expedition. From instructional tools, web presence, mobile devices, audio, video, social networking, collaboration and personal productivity –we will cover it all! Additionally, you will have the opportunity to network with current MAET students and attend the 2010 PLATE leadership conference on July 15. (What is PLATE? See 2009 PLATE & 2008 PLATE)

You will be required to participate in asynchronous online pre-class project planning activities June 28- July 6. This will be a self-paced portion of the course to help us make the most of our synchronous time together.

In addition to our classroom time together, in true MAET style we will have our student services coordinator Jean-Pierre Heussaff at your service to supplement your academic experience with cultural excursions.

Cost Breakdown –

Tuition – $1845 (3 graduate credits)
Housing – $575 (Single en-suite room (see slideshow below), breakfast and lunch Monday – Friday)

Optional Transportation Package – $176 (round trip coach from CDG airport to Rouen + 10 TCAR Rouen bus passes)

Space is limited to 20 participants – to reserve your spot go to

http://edutech.educ.msu.edu/MAETSummerRes.php

(If you get your reservation in by March 15th, $50 will be credited towards your balance!)

Questions? Email edutech [at] msu [dot] edu

Web Redesign Boot Camp – MSU Viewing Party!

The MSU Master of Arts in Educational Technology program would like to invite others in the MSU community to view the Higher Ed Experts Web Redesign Boot Camp Webinar series!  Our registration allows an unlimited number of attendees at our connection – this is an excellent opportunity for the MSU Web Dev community to connect!

Here are the important details:

Website Redesign Boot Camp: what you need to know before jumping into a redesign project
February 16, 17 & 18, 2010 – 1PM-2PM ET

http://higheredexperts.com/edu/webinar/website-redesign-boot-camp/

MSU Campus Viewing Locations

February 16th – 1pm – 2pm Room 215 Computer Center
February 17th – 1pm – 2pm Room 215 Computer Center
February 18th – 1pm – 2pm Room 318 Computer Center

CORRECTION TO ROOM LOCATIONS (2/10/10):

02/16/10 –  215 Computer Center     1:00- 2:00 pm
02/17/10  – 318 Computer Center     1:00- 2:00 pm (we have to leave promptly; another meeting is scheduled at 2:00 pm)
02/18/10 –  318 Computer Center     1:00- 2:00 pm

A big thank you to Debbie Malcangi (Academic Technology Services) and Ranti Junus (MSU Libraries) for helping to coordinate a room!

Below – you will find the description of each webinar — we will be streaming each webinar on the big screen and we have the room reserved for a bit after the viewing to allow time to chat and mingle.

We look forward to seeing you!

UPDATE: I am waiting to hear back about rebroadcasting archived sessions for those who cannot make the sessions above. Please leave a comment below if you are interested in the webinars, but cannot make these sessions.

February 16, 2010 – 1PM-2PM ET
Top trends in higher ed redesigned websites
Stewart Foss, Founder of EduStyle and co-author of The eduStyle Guide to Usable Higher Ed Homepage Design, will present the latest trends in higher ed web design identified among the best redesigned websites (homepage, departmental, admissions, etc.) in 2009.

February 17, 2010 – 1PM-2PM ET
How to survive a Website Redesign & a CMS Implementation
Ben Riseling, Manager of Web Operations for the Office of News & Communications at Duke University, will make sure your survive your next website redesign coupled with a CMS implementation. He will share the best tips and tricks he acquired during the 9-month process preceding the launch of the new duke.edu powered by the open source CMS, Drupal, in October 2009.

February 18, 2010 – 1PM-2PM ET
Recipe for Successful Web Redesigns
Chas Grundy, Director of Interactive Marketing for AgencyND – a marketing agency within the University of Notre Dame, will explain how his team manages website redesigns for different departments and offices as well as for the university homepage. He will share best practices and lessons learned as well as his own recipe for sucessful web redesigns and happy stakeholders.

Calling all #MAET Alumni!

Zazzle Tastic!

I’m excited to announce a new course for ALL MSU Master of Arts in Educational Technology alumni!

CEP 891 – Special Topics – MAET Refresher Course
3 graduate credits
July 11-18, 2010 – Rouen, France

In 2008, Jim Groom coined the term Edupunk, since then, the term has spread and come to symbolize educators who take an approach to teaching and learning practices that result from a DIY or bricolage (the construction or creation of a work from a diverse range of things which happen to be available) attitude.

The 2010 MAET refresher course will embrace the Edupunk mantra and help refill your technology toolbox with a plethora of tips and tricks to help you continue your post-MA educational technology expedition.  From instructional tools, web presence, mobile devices, audio, video, social networking, collaboration and personal productivity –we will cover it all!  Additionally, you will have the opportunity to network with current MAET students and attend the 2010 PLATE leadership conference on July 15.  (What is PLATE? See 2009 PLATE2008 PLATE)

You will be required to participate in asynchronous online pre-class project planning activities June 28- July 6.  This will be a self-paced portion of the course to help us make the most of our synchronous time together.

In addition to our classroom time together, in true MAET style we will have our student services coordinator Jean-Pierre Heussaff at your service to supplement your academic experience with cultural excursions.

Cost Breakdown –

Tuition – $1845 (3 graduate credits)
Housing – $575 (Single en-suite room (see slideshow below), breakfast and lunch Monday – Friday)

Optional Transportation Package – $176 (round trip coach from CDG airport to Rouen + 10 TCAR Rouen bus passes)

Space is limited to 20 participants – to reserve your spot go to

http://edutech.educ.msu.edu/MAETSummerRes.php

Questions? Email edutech [at] msu [dot] edu

Martin Luther King Jr.

I think Alfred Nobel would know what I mean when I say that I accept this award in the spirit of a curator of some precious heirloom which he holds in trust for its true owners — all those to whom beauty is truth and truth beauty — and in whose eyes the beauty of genuine brotherhood and peace is more precious than diamonds or silver or gold.

Martin Luther King, Jr.
Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech
December 10, 1964, Oslo, Norway

Socially Sourced Feedback: The Experiment

820 feedback

This semester has been quite a challenge – I have really pushed myself (in addition to my students) in CEP 820.  Quick background – CEP 820: Teaching K12 Students Online is one of the required courses needed to receive the NP Endorsement from MSU.  Additionally, the course can be taken as an elective for the MAED online program.  The main culminating project in the course is the creation of a complete online course module.  The creation of the module is scaffolded through the semester,  students must evaluate and choose a CMS and they are highly encouraged to use content from their professional practice to create the online or hybrid course (or unit.)

I have been involved in educational technology for about 12 years now – based upon my past experience – one might categorize me as an expert (or at least highly proficient) in assisting with technology integration in cross curricular and multi-disciplinary educational settings.  If you’re familiar with the TPACK model – I have the T and P down and I help people who have the “C” (subject matter expertise in science, special education, composition…etc.)  Therefore, to give my students a rich, authentic assessment of their final projects, I wanted to connect them to people who had the “total package” (a play on t-pack.) In essence, people who had experience with online/hybrid course development (T),  veteran teachers (P) and subject matter experts (C).

I am so lucky to have a large and diverse Personal Learning Network (PLN.) This network consists of professors, MAET alumni, PhD students, practicing teachers, online learning experts, and on and on.  Back in November I sent out an innocuous email to a cohort of people in my PLN. <Here is the text of the invite> In short, I was asking friends and colleagues to access a student course and use Jing + Screencast.com (both free tools) to record their reactions, feedback and suggestions for improvement. I specifically targeted people in my network who I thought would match well with my current students.

I was able to collect 16 brave souls willing to participate in the experiment.  I sincerely want to thank the following for giving the gift of their precious time to assist in this experiment:

Now that I had my reviewers in place the next task was to gather the details for 40 student courses and send them on to the external reviewers in individual emails.  I had been giving feedback on the development of the online modules all the way through, so I was very familiar with the content, I also know my PLN very well, so I did my best to match content area experts with content area experts, created a “form email” <see it here> and shipped each reviewer 2 modules to evaluate.

Keep in mind, that we were not working on any prior use model or case study — this was a new venture for everyone involved. I did my best to mediate the fear and trepidation on the student and reviewer side – putting forth the brave front – knowing that this would somehow work out. It could not fail with such a talented and adventurous group of both students and colleagues!

By now I’m sure you’re interested in seeing what actually happened — Here are a few highlights (links open in new windows, make sure your audio is up!):

Troy’s review of Erin’s “6 Traits of Writing” on Weebly Unit
Jessica’s review of Emily’s “American History” Moodle Unit
Sean’s review of Marc’s “Jared Diamond unit for World History” in Blackboard

So….what did I think of the whole process?

The downsides –

  • I am risking the fact that I may be relying too heavily on my PLN. At the end of the semester, something like this is the icing on the stress cake.  I purposely timed the submission of the final project 4 weeks before the official end of the semester to try and alleviate some of this stress.
  • This was incredibly tedious to manage.  I wish I could have figured out a way to make the revier/reviewee process a little more automatic, but it was all done manually.  This required minute attention to detail, making sure the right hyperlinks were going to the right people and making sure no one fell through the cracks. With everyone using different course management systems, keeping track of all the access points was a bit of a challenge.
  • Not everyone turned in their assignment on time.  I’m an understanding instructor and I know things happen (all of my students are working adults, many carrying 2 or more courses plus a full time job) – but it is not fair to the external reviewers to send them late reviews (as they too have full plates.) Laeeq (my teaching assistant), Jess Knott (who graciously volunteered) and I conducted any of the late submission reviews.
  • I was not able to match everyone up with the “perfect” person — I had to stretch a bit when it came to content experts. (All of  my reviewers were expert in online/hybrid course creation and pedagogy.)

The upsides –

  • I have connected my students to AMAZING people
  • My network was able to experience an alternative form of assessment in a “low-risk” setting.  Low-risk in the sense that they could try this out with the 820 students. (We took on the high-risk!)
  • The external reviewers expressed appreciation in learning how to use screencasting as a form of assessment/evaluation.

If I do this again…

  • I will be more explicit with my reviewers and give them some tips on microphone and recording techniques.  (I have a degree in audio production…I can’t help but be picky about production value!) I provided this support structure to the students (screencasting was one of the technologies we focused on during the semester) – it’s only fair I do this for reviewers as well!
  • I will only ask external reviewers to perform one review
  • I will try to adjust the final project due date one week earlier to avoid the end of semester crunch.

Help me continue the evaluation of the experiment
There is so much more to talk about! With the evidence presented — I need to hear from the reviewers and students.  I am on the fence about doing this again next semester (leaning more towards doing it again, I thought it was quite successful…but I am wavering a bit.) CEP 820 students, was this a valuable experience for you? Evaluators, was this too much to ask? Others, are you intrigued to try this – or have you tried this and do you have tips to share, ways I can improve the process? Do you want to be on the reviewer list next semester!?

I look forward to continuing the conversation!

Adventures in Verbal Feedback

Voice Memo app

I’m always experimenting with non-text ways to give feedback.  (I’m more comfortable giving verbal feedback.)  Time is always an issue when we’re trying to give students authentic and meaningful assessment.

This week I have been experimenting with finding a quick way to provide audio based feedback to students. I love using Jing for more thorough feedback — but I was looking for something a little less process intensive.  (Jing is awesome for allowing you to comment and “point” while they’re following along with you – but for something quick there is the processing, uploading and then sending the link time which quickly adds up when you have 40 students!)

First, I tried the iPhone app Tweetmic – it was working perfectly in my experiments last night (for 2 recordings) then it conked out. I was so hopeful that this tool would work out because it was SO quick and easy.  I simply launched the app on my iPhone and the link posted a permalink immediately to Twitter, which I could then forward to students. Luckily, as I started the feedback session, I went back to double check the recordings — 4 in a row did not record.  I am VERY thankful I remembered to go back and check – I would not be a happy camper right now if I had 40 blank recordings.

Then I tried Aviary‘s audio editor — this did not work well for a quick recording.  Too many clicks.

So, I went back to the iPhone — and decided to use the Voice Memos application (which is installed by default) which allows you to email the voice memo to yourself.

Using something like Audacity would have required recording, saving, uploading, then linking and sending (the “Jing” conundrum.)  The Voice Memo app combined with email was the least time intensive solution I could find — as you know, time is of the essence and when you have so many to produce, you need to save as much time as possible “tinkering around.”

As a post script – I of course posted a tweet expressing my frustration with TweetMic and had an auto reply from http://chirbit.com – I may give it a try down the road.

Do you have any tips or tricks to share? (Have you tried Chirbit?) Of course, my ideal course management system would allow these quick in-line audio recordings. Until then, bricolage is my game (h/t to Claude Lévi-Strauss who passed away this week.)  I don’t see the capability in Google Wave yet, but maybe it’s a plug in that will come with the API development!